Western Living Magazine
Bathroom Tip #6: Keep Your Loo Out of View for a Spa-Like Retreat
6 Staircase Landings That Have Been Transformed into Cute and Cozy Nooks
Bathroom Tip #5: Make the mirror the star
6 Ways to Treat Your Sweetheart (and Sweet Tooth!) This Valentine’s Day
Ask a Chef: Get Expert Answers to Your Top Kitchen Questions
Chef’s Tips: Shred, Grate and Grind Like a Pro
My Mexico City: Designer Ben Leavitt Shares His Mexico Itinerary
My Camogli: The Founders of Falken Reynolds Share Their Favourite Spots in Camogli, Italy
Staycation on the Sunshine Coast
Trending for 2024: Top 10 Stylish Furniture and Home Design Picks to Revitalize Your Space
How to achieve kitchen perfection: luxury appliance brand Fisher & Paykel shares all
Editors’ Picks: The Best Books We Read in 2023
Introducing the Winners of Our First Annual WL Design 25 Awards
WL Design 25 Winners 2024: White Out
WL Design 25 Winners 2024: Full Tilt
A pretty darn magnificent bottle of Moon Curser Tempranillo reminded me of the need to always put critics' take in the proper perspective.
Moon Curser Tempranillo 2012 $32I look at wine reviews all the time. If it’s a wine I’m not familiar with, or if it’s a bottle I’ve set down for a few years and I want to see how it’s drinking, often the first thing I do is Google it. It doesn’t govern what I’m going to do or think, but it’s a useful starting point. The problem starts when you start taking them as gospel because all a wine review is, is a certain person’s take at a certain point in time—that’s it.I was reminded of this when I cracked this bottle of wine a few nights back. As anyone who reads WL probably knows, I’m a big fan of Osoyoos’ Moon Curser. Not only is their wine top tier, they constantly are pushing boundaries in the Okanagan by experimenting with new varieties: Touriga Nacional, Arneis, Carmenere are a refreshing antidote to the sea of Pinot Gris much of the rest of the Valley swims in. So I was a tad surprised when, in an otherwise largely positive review, I noted the wine being described as “astringent.” I opened the bottle and tasted. I let the glass sit for an hour and tasted again. And then I just started drinking it. It was that ideal marriage of new world winemaking and old world varietals—it had some rusticity but also some supple red fruit to balance it out. If anything it skewed more towards lush and away from astringency. Was the wine critic wrong? Not at all, in fact it was someone who has an amazing palate and my tremendous respect. It could have been bottle variation or more likely the extra 18 months of bottle age between our two tastings had done wonders for the wine.The fact was that it was a snapshot of the wine as it tasted to that person a year and a half previous. This wine went on to garner quite a few medals at various international competitions and I, from my tasting, still reckon it’s trending upwards. But what do I know—I’m just another wine critic.
Are you over 18 years of age?